Welcome!

Symbian Authors: Jack Newton, Kevin Benedict, Matthew Lobas, Shelly Palmer, RealWire News Distribution

News Feed Item

Woulfe Mining Clarifies and Restates Certain Disclosure

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- (Marketwire) -- 02/18/13 -- Woulfe Mining Corp. (TSX VENTURE:WOF)(OTCQX:WFEMF)(FRANKFURT:OZ4) ("Woulfe" or the "Company") -

Woulfe Mining Corp. reports that as a result of a review by the British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC), it is issuing the following news release to clarify, retract, restate and update certain of its previously issued investor relations presentations, reports and disclosures on its website www.woulfemining.com.

The Company's website, including a corporate presentation, a fact sheet and investor's guide (the "Materials"), contained the following information, none of which invalidates any portion of, or requires any amendment in relation to, the Company's feasibility study on the Sangdong property as published June 6, 2012:


--  The Company's website and November 2012 Investor Guide (the "Guide")
    disclosed 2010 mineral resource estimates, completed as part of a
    scoping study (the "2010 Scoping Study"). The 2010 Scoping Study and
    mineral resource estimates have been superseded by a feasibility study
    on the Sangdong property having an effective date of June 6, 2012 and
    entitled "Sangdong Project Feasibility Study" (the "Feasibility Study").
    The Feasibility Study was authored by TetraTech WEI Inc. and is
    available on the Company's SEDAR profile. It reports a Probable Reserve
    of 13.3 Mt @ 0.425% WO3 with a cut-off grade of 0.24% WO3. The
    Feasibility Study did not contain a complete mineral resource update,
    but converted a prior reported Indicated Resource of 16.4 Mt.@ 0.45% WO3
    with a cut-off of 0.15% WO3 to the Probable Reserve reported above. The
    prior resource estimates on the Sangdong property, including the
    Indicated Resource referenced above, had an effective date of January
    24, 2012 and were included in a report entitled "Sangdong Project
    Resource Estimate" authored by Wardrop, TetraTech WEI Inc (the "2012
    Resource Report"). The 2012 Resource Report is available on the
    Company's SEDAR profile. The mineral resource estimates contained in the
    2012 Resource Report are stated in the table below, noting that the
    Feasibility Study has converted the Indicated Resource to a Probable
    Reserve. It should be noted that the 2012 Resource Report states that
    the 2010 mineral resource estimates were made on a very different basis
    to the current (2012) estimates. The 2010 resource estimates largely
    relied on holes drilled underground by Korea Tungsten Mining Corporation
    and on a coarse geological interpretation of the mineralized zones.
    Because of doubts attaching to the location and sample quality control
    of these underground holes, and the limited geological understanding at
    the time, the 2010 mineral resources were classified in the Inferred
    category. The 2012 resource estimates rely entirely on modern drilling
    programmes with associated sample quality control. The modern data,
    however, covers only approximately the upper quarter of the known dip-
    length of the mineralized zones. For this reason, comparisons between
    the 2012 and 2010 mineral resource estimates should be treated with
    caution. 

Table Sangdong, Skarn mineralisation Resource Estimate; reporting cutoff
0.15% WO3.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resource        Mineralized    Tonnes               WO3    MoS2             
Category        Zone              (Mt)  Density   (%)(i) (%)(ii)         MTU
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated       F2              2.298      2.98    0.63    0.04    1,448,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated       F3              2.605      2.96    0.56    0.05    1,458,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated       Halo            5.576      2.91    0.27    0.03    1,505,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated       Main            5.952      3.25    0.50    0.03    2,976,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indicated(ii)   Total          16.431      3.04    0.45    0.04    7,387,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        F2              2.680      2.91    0.50    0.03    1,340,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        F3              2.712      2.90    0.49    0.03    1,329,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        Halo            6.523      2.88    0.23    0.02    1,500,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        HW              7.191      2.96    0.58    0.08    4,171,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        Main            0.259      2.92    .052    0.02      135,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        Total          19.368      2.92    0.44    0.05    8,475,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        F2              4.097      2.85    0.60    0.07    2,458,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        F3              4.315      2.85    0.57    0.06    2,460,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        Halo            5.973      2.85    0.21    0.06    1,254,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        HW             15.924      2.84    0.69    0.11   10,988,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred        Main            4.208      2.85    0.60    0.03    2,525,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inferred Down   Total          34.519      2.85    0.57    0.07   19,685,000
Dip                                                                        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note: MoS2 is reported in terms of WO3 cut-off.
    WO3 = Tungsten trioxide, MoS2 - Molybdenum Disulphide, MTU - metric
          tonne unit.
    (ii) Indicated Resources was converted to a Probable Reserve in the
         Feasibility Study.

    The resource is split into two sections by elevation, representing the
    down dip potential of the deposit below current waterline.

    The only current mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates that
    have been approved by or on behalf of the Company in relation to the
    Sangdong property are as stated above in the 2012 Resource Report and
    the Feasibility Study.

--  The website and Materials contained aggregated resource numbers which
    added Inferred Resources to other categories of resources in respect of
    the Sangdong property, or which used a category of mineral resources,
    specifically "mineable resource", not permitted by NI 43-101 in respect
    of the Muguk property. 

--  The website and Materials discloses the results of economic analyses
    from the Company's feasibility study which may be misleading and/or
    unbalanced as the website and Material only reference pre-tax results
    without disclosing the comparative post-tax results. Investors are
    strongly encouraged to review the Feasibility Study in full. 

--  The Guide contained a reference to historical, non-43-101 compliant,
    resource estimates for the Sangdong Moly Stockwork. A non-NI 43-101
    compliant historical resource estimate for molybdenum at the Sangdong
    property was reported by Korea Engineering Co. Ltd. in 2001 and a memo
    of Paul Matthews and Heywood Bates in 2008. A Qualified Person has not
    completed sufficient work in order to classify historical resource
    estimates for molybdenum on the Sangdong property as current mineral
    resources and the Company is not treating these historical estimates as
    prepared by Korea Engineering Co. Ltd. or Paul Matthews and Heywood
    Bates or otherwise as current mineral resources but as historical
    estimates. They are for informational purposes only and should not be
    relied upon. 

--  The website and Materials incorrectly references a 0.20% cut-off in
    relation to the 2012 resource estimates, where a 0.15% cut-off was used,
    as outlined above. 

--  The website and Materials failed to properly identify, and disclose the
    relationship to the Company, of the Qualified Person who approved,
    prepared or supervised the preparation of the technical information
    within. The Company has added this disclosure to its website and the
    Materials. 

The Company retracts all non-compliant disclosures as referenced above and has amended the website and Materials to remove such disclosures, including the Guide which will be updated at a later date. The Company plans to complete a more comprehensive re-launch of the Company's website in the future.

In those instances where the Company has retracted, revised, clarified or updated previous disclosure, the Company advises readers not to rely on such statements as they may continue to be found in the public domain.

Patrick Roger Stephenson, P.Geo., of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., an independent consultant to the Company, is the Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 who has approved the technical content of this news release.

On Behalf of the Board of Directors

Woulfe Mining Corp.

Brian Wesson (FAusIMM), President, CEO and Director

About Woulfe Mining Corp.

In partnership with IMC, Woulfe is developing the Sangdong tungsten-molybdenum mine which was historically, one of the largest tungsten mines in the world and one of the few long life, high grade tungsten deposits outside of China. The Company has assembled a highly skilled, in-country, bilingual technical team and a board of directors with an outstanding track record of success.

Woulfe Mining Corp. is a TSX-V listed company.

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information by their nature are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. We have made certain assumptions about the forward-looking statements and information and even though our management believes that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statement or information will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, should one or more of the risks, uncertainties or other factors materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements or information. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others, the following: commodity price volatility; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, mineral reserves and resources and metallurgical recoveries; mining operational and development risk; litigation risks; regulatory restrictions, including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability; failure to complete the strategic arrangement described in this release, including because of the failure to satisfy the conditions to closing of the transaction, risks of sovereign investment; currency fluctuations; speculative nature of mineral exploration; global economic climate; dilution; share price volatility; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements.

There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements or information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements or information contained herein. Except as required by law, we do not expect to update forward-looking statements and information continually as conditions change and you are referred to the full discussion of the Company's business contained in the Company's reports filed with the appropriate regulatory authorities.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

More Stories By Marketwired .

Copyright © 2009 Marketwired. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Marketwired are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.